Making a Square out of Circles

Let's say you're a marine biologist, and you've recorded a bunch of whales and dolphins, and you want to study the sounds that they're making.  Some of the cetacean species you've recorded will be making sounds too high for you to hear (like porpoises and beaked whales), and some will be much too low (like blue whales).  In addition, some biologists (like the ones who are older or have attended too many KISS concerts, might not be able to hear very well at all.

One of the ways biologists get over this is by turning the sounds into pictures, like this picture of a dolphin whistle:

This is called a spectrogram.

Here, we can see that the whistle starts out high, and then drops down in frequency, and goes back up again. Frequency is on the y axis.

Remember, loud sounds have high amplitude (shown as a darker red in the spectrogram above), and high frequency sounds have a high frequency (which will put them high on the y axis of the spectrogram).

This transformation between sound and picture is done via something called the Fourier equation.  The Fourier equation is really cool - it takes a complex sound, made out of multiple different frequencies, and breaks it up into the component frequencies.  It's kind of hard to picture this happening, so I decided to start with a simple single-frequency sound, and make it into a complex frequency sound, so we could see what was happening in the reverse.

So what complex sound can I make from simple sine waves?  What about a square wave?

Figure from Khin Hooi.

Click here to listen to a square wave.

Single frequency sounds are composed of pure sine or cosine waves, which are rounded like this:

However, we can create a square wave by adding additional frequencies, each one of which is an odd harmonic frequency of the original sine wave, and which is smaller in amplitude by a specific amount. For example, in the first step to making a square wave, we would add sin(3*t)/3 to the original equation for the sine wave, y=sin(t).  Then we would add sin(5*t)/5, sin(7*t)/7, sin(9*t)/9, and so on for the odd numbers until the wave is square enough to make us happy. Here's an animation of the frequencies being added up to make a square wave:

Cool, so now we've made a sound out of a bunch of different frequencies.  The next thing to do is to use our Fourier transform on it, to take it back apart again.

The figures on the left are of the square wave I've created, and on the right are of the Fourier spectrogram of that wave.  In the first row of figures, you can see that there is only one frequency, and the spectrogram only shows one line (the light blue one at the bottom). As I add more frequencies, more and more (lighter and lighter) lines appear on the spectrogram.

I thought this was a pretty good demonstration of how Fourier Transform works. We've made a complex signal, and then Fourier helped us take it back apart again so we could visualize the different sine waves that make up the signal again.

If you can't get enough of this stuff, here's an excellent post I found about building a sawtooth wave.

Also, here's a great little youtube animation of the making of a square wave:

If you have matlab, and want to try this out, email me for the code.

How loud is that whale, anyway?

When we're thinking about how loud a noise needs to be to damage a whale's hearing, it's important to consider how loud the sounds are that the whale makes itself. If a singing whale makes a sound itself that is at a certain sound level, it is pretty unlikely that it will be deafened by being exposed to a sound of the same level.  This is something like how you are unlikely to be deafened by the sound of your own voice. This isn't to say that continual exposure to sounds at or quieter than their own won't affect whales. It will - just like constant low-noise sounds such as traffic can damage human health.

Calibrating hydrophone sensitivity
curves is very pleasurable.

The first step in figuring out how loud your whale is to drop a hydrophone in the water. Hydrophones convert pressure into voltage (if you're interested in how, I explain here). Hydrophones also have a property called sensitivity, which is a measurement of how quiet of a sound that the hydrophone can hear. The difference in sound sensitivity between a very sensitive hydrophone and a very insensitive hydrophone is like the difference in touch sensitivity between your tounge and your heel. A light touch on the heel might not make any neurons fire, but...

As an aside, in the book "Last Chance to See," Douglas Adams puts a microphone in a condom and uses it to try and listen to Yangtzee river dolphins in China. (Insert nerdy bio-acoustition joke here).

Hydrophone sensitivity is usually listed as a single number, something you will notice if you are a buyer of hydrophones or microphones. This number is negative, and the less negative, the more sensitive the hydrophone. Listing a single number actually oversimplifies things. For example, let's look at the sensitivity of the Reson TC 4024 hydrophone at a range of frequencies between 0 and about 90 kHz. If you remember, frequency determines how shrill a sound is. Barry White, for example, has a low frequency voice, and the Chipmunks squeak their songs at high frequencies. OK, so the "typical receiving sensitivity of this hydrophone" is listed as -173 dB. But, as you can see, the sensitivity actually varies quite a lot with frequency:

Because of this, most people only use their hydrophones to record sounds in the "flat frequency response" region, which, for this hydrophone, is between about 4 Hz and 45 kHz. This flat frequency region is pretty much about equal to -173 dB (and if you want to be really specific about things you can always go back and correct for the variation later - as long as your hydrophone is calibrated!)

You'll probably also need to know your gain. Gain means amplification. Generally, the signals coming out of the hydrophone are still too quiet to use, so we amplify them again.

Finally, we can calculate how loud the whale is. So here we go:

Sound Pressure Level = Sensitivity - Gain + 20 * log (Voltage from the Hydrophone)

It's actually pretty simple once you know what all the numbers mean...

... except for the fact that, by convention, the Sound Pressure Level is measured at 1 m from the sound source. So, if we are working with wild animals, we will either have to get incredibly lucky, or we have to figure out a way to deal with attenuation of the sound in water. Attenuation is a fancy word that means "makes quieter." For example, sound-proof walls attenuate the sound of your neighbor's Eminem music.  I'll deal with that one a little bit later.

You almost never get this lucky. Photo by Flip Nicklin.

Tweet

Why Can't We Directly Compare Sounds in Water and Air?

One of the biggest, and most common, mistakes that people make when writing about underwater acoustics is making direct comparisons between the loudness of things in water and in air.  Here's an example of something that you might read about underwater sound:

"The bottlenose dolphins were being exposed to sounds up to 160 dB.  That's  louder than a 747!"

Well, actually, it's not.   

The problem here is related to the units with which we measure sound. First of all, we measure sound using the decibel.  Decibels are logarithmic units. Basically, logarithmic scales allow us to make big numbers smaller so that they are easier to visualize. For example, in the chart below, you can see that when we take the log of value for x (in green), the log values (in blue) are decreased more for large values of x than for small values of x. The opposite is true of taking an exponential of x, such as x^2 (in red).

Why make things so complicated when we talk about sound? Well, human beings actually perceive sound pressure in a log scale.  For example, you wouldn't really be able to tell the difference in loudness between 6 trumpet players and 7 trumpet players, because your brain doesn't process sound lineally. In fact, every time you want to change the loudness level by just three measly decibels, you have to double the power.  So, if you want to increase the loudness of your trumpet players by 3 dB, you'll need 6 more trumpets.  

Doublemint gum only makes you 3 dB louder, just ask the dolphins.

OK, so now we understand decibels, why can't we compare dB in air with dB in water?

First of all, decibels must always be referenced to some standard. In air, decibels are referenced to 20 micropascals (pascals are a unit of pressure). In water, they are referenced to 1 micropascal.  This means that, from the start, 26 dB must be added to the sound level to make the two references levels the same.

Secondly, water is much denser than air, so the effects of pressure are also different. Although it is possible to compress water, it is much more difficult to do so.  In fact, when we add the difference in densities between air and water into the equation, we find that the sound pressure in water is 60 times greater (or 35.6 dB higher) than the same value in air.

Loud, but not as loud as a plane. Photo from the CRRU.

So, if white-beaked dolphins are producing whistles that are between 139 and 148 dB, that doesn't mean that they are making sounds louder than a 747. If we convert those numbers to values in air, we get somewhere between 103 and 113 dB.  Which is still pretty darn loud, but not quite as loud an airplane engine.  It's also good to point out that dolphin whistles are "narrowband" sounds. I explained narrowband in an earlier blog post, but basically what this means is that you can't imagine a whistling dolphin sounding like a jackhammer, because the sounds cover a very different range of frequencies and are produced by very different mechanisms.

So, next time you read something comparing underwater sound compared to sound in air, check to see if they did their conversions right!

Tweet

A wave is a complicated thing to equate

I am only studying chapter 1.2.1 of my big scary bioacoustics book, and already I'm running into some scary maths (tm). However, my advisor has told me that I don't have to actually know how to derive the equations, just understand them conceptually (Apparently I am getting my PhD in Zoology and not Electrical Engineering - could have fooled me!).

I use sound to study whales in the ocean. Understanding sound is absolutely essential to my research, and to understand sound, you've got to understand the wave equation.

We're not going to actually derive the wave equation, but it's important to know what goes into it. (if you want to see the real math, look here). In order to understand waves, you need to understand four other fundamental laws. The great thing about these laws is that they pretty much are telling you that waves obey the laws of physics. By the combined powers of these laws, Captain Wave equation emerges!

Conservation of Mass: This means that even though the number of molecules in any part of the volume that  sound passes through may change, the total number of molecules in the volume stays the same.

In the sound wave, molecules get more
compressed, but don't appear out of thin air. 

Equation of Motion (Newton's Second Law): This means that we can calculate the force acting on particles by multiplying their density when a sound is passing through them by their acceleration.

Force = Acoustic Density * Acceleration

Equation of Force: With this, we can use the total density of the fluid (which is different from the acoustic density) and divide it by the x movement of the particles to find the force acting on the particles.

Force = Total Density differential * x differential

Equation of State: This tells us that acoustic pressure is related to how easily the medium through which a sound travels is compressed. Some people think that liquids and solids can't be compressed, but this isn't true. The reason we generally consider liquids to be incompressible is that it is REALLY REALLY hard to compress a liquid. I couldn't do it, even if I worked out a LOT.  However, liquids at the bottom of the ocean have the weight of tons of water sitting on top of them.  The weight of all this water presses down on the liquid, pushing the molecules closer together. In fact, if you have enough pressure, you can even compress rocks. Here's my version of this equation:

Pressure = (squishiness / acoustic pressure) * pressure

When you put these four equations together, you get the wave equation, which uses all four to describe the movement of a wave. This equation factors in pressure, time, the speed of sound, and the movement of particles.

Why is this important to a whale researcher?  Well, if I want to use sound to study animals underwater, I need to understand that sound travels differently in different types of water. In the ocean, things that might change how sound travels are depth, salinity, and temperature. If, for example, a beaked whale is clicking at 5000 m, and I am recording it at the surface, I can't assume that the sound is traveling in a straight line from the whale to me. As the depth and temperature changes, the way sound moves through it will change. I need to be mindful that these things can change how sound moves through the water.

I warned you this was going to be dense. And that was only chapter 1.2.1.

Also, if I made a math mistake, and I messed up on understanding any of the equations, please comment!


Tweet

What is looking for dolphins in the ocean really like?

Many people are curious about what it is like to be out on a boat looking for dolphins in Hawaii. Lots of people think it's easy - my job is simply to sit on a boat and watch dolphins. Many people have a hard time believing that you can actually get paid to lounge on a boat and watch dolphins frolic in the surf.  The reality is a lot more complicated.

This is not what I look at all day (photo from FIRMM.org).

Finding dolphins, especially in Hawaii, can be really time consuming and difficult. Especially if you are interested in the types of dolphins that don't generally hang out near shore, which is most Hawaiian species (the exception being spinner dolphins).

Searching for dolphins at sea requires something called a "search image." Visual predators use search image all the time to find food. For example, blue jays look for the color, shape, or pattern of a moth to find their food. Prey can also use a search image to look out for predators: sea lions also use a visual search image to watch out for hungry killer whales.  If a killer whale doesn't match their search image - for example, by having a weird, bent over dorsal fin - sea lions don't always recognize it as a threat.

Biologists also use search images. Bird biologists look for something moving against a still background. Snail biologists look for a round, white spiral in a sea of shaking green leaves. And dolphin biologists look for moving triangles (dorsal fins) in a sea of other moving triangles (waves).

Lots and lots of blue-gray triangles. But which is a dolphin?
Photo by Alexis Rudd, 8/15/12.

Looking at waves is a lot like looking at the ants on a tv screen.  It's kind of like watching random noise (although obviously I am oversimplifying things to give you an idea, waves aren't really random).

So, most of the time, when whale and dolphin observers are  looking at the ocean, it's like looking at this (you might want to adjust your screen so you can only see one of these .gif files at a time - it's making me kind of queasy):

When a large whale comes along, the observer sees a shape in the noise that isn't changing for a little while, like this:

Did you find the "whale?" Hint: it's the blacker spot that appears in the bottom right hand corner for about 3 seconds.

Dolphins are even harder to see, because they move faster. When a scientist is searching for a dolphin, they look for a shape that isn't changing very much, but might be moving across the waves.  Can you spot my "dolphin?"

That one's kind of hard (I am having trouble, and I made the thing!), so I made the "dolphin" pink.  Now can you see it?

This week, I've been out on the water on the big island, helping look for whales and dolphins. We usually get out on the water at about 6:00 am (sometimes a little earlier) and come back in at 3:00 pm (if we're lucky unlucky). For the last two days, we have seen two groups of animals per day. That means that we have effectively been staring at noise for about 8 hours, searching for that tiny little clue that will tell us where the dolphins might be.  Coastal cetaceans are not spread out as much as in the tropics, so there is not always as much time staring at noise.

Isn't the human brain an amazing thing? It can pick up a tiny difference in pattern -

"That bit of the ocean isn't moving as much as the other bits!"

out of an enormous amount of noise. There isn't much on earth that's more enormous than the ocean.


Tweet

What You Know* About the Difference in Dolphins and Porpoises is Wrong**

*Mostly  **Some of the time

Last weekend I was lucky enough to speak at a math workshop for high school teachers put on by some of the University of Hawaii Match Department faculty.  And let me just start out by saying that it was AWESOME.  As anyone who has ever read "How to Win Friends and Influence People" knows, one of the best ways to get people to like you is to ask them questions about themselves.  For scientists, this extends to talking about our research. Beware asking a scientist good, intelligent questions about their work: you may be there for hours!

So, talking to the math teachers was an incredible treat.  They asked great questions, including one of my favorites, "What's the difference between a dolphin and a porpoise?"  Porpoises are from the cetacean family Phocoenidae, while dolphins are in the family Delphinidae.  I love this question, because there are so many misconceptions about what makes a porpoise.  This cartoon does a great job of showcasing those misconceptions:

Let's get the easiest misconception out of the way first: size.  I'll admit the average weight of porpoises is less than the average weight of dolphins.  However, there are many examples in which this just isn't true.  For example:

Dall's Porpoise (up to 200 lbs)

Hector's dolphin (up to 125 lbs)

So size of the animal isn't exactly the best diagnostic to use when deciding whether something is a dolphin or a whale.  How about rostrum (head) shape?

  Risso's Dolphin by Greg Boreham                             Finless Porpoise

Hmm, one of those is a dolphin and one is a porpoise, but they seem to actually have very similarly shaped heads.

OK, FINE! But if it has a bottlenose like Flipper, we DEFINITELY know it's a dolphin, RIGHT?

Northern bottlenose whale  (Hyperoodon ampullatus, in Family Ziphidae)

ARGHHHH!  It must be the fins, then. Dolphins HAVE to have pointy dorsal fins (the one on their back), and porpoises have rounded fins!

Chilean dolphin (rounded)                                                      Dall's Porpoise (pointy)

No dorsal fin at all (Southern Right Whale Dolphin).
The finless porpoise also has no dorsal fin, as the name implies.

OK, I give up, there must be SOMETHING I can use to figure out whether this random cetacean I got in the mail is a dolphin or a porpoise - but what????

TEETH!

Bottlenose dolphin                                |                             Harbor Porpoise

Dolphins have cone-shaped teeth throughout their mouth, while porpoises have what are known as spade-shaped teeth.  Here's a comparison, with A being the porpoise tooth and B being the dolphin tooth.

Dichotomous keys are tools that scientists use to figure out what species they are looking at.  These keys are kind of like those "build your own story" books that you had when you were a kid. You are asked a series of questions, and the questions lead to an ending.  It's also a lot like 20 questions, with each question further narrowing down the possibilities of which species you could have.  In fact, if you were using a dichotomous key to determine the species of a cetacean, the tooth question is what separates the porpoises from everything else.  

Try keying out whale, dolphin, and porpoise species
at the Marine Species Identification Portal!

In general, can you use these rules to distinguish between a dolphin and a porpoise?  Sure you can. But it's important to be aware of the many exceptions. Let's be honest, the likelihood of encountering Dall's Porpoise (found on the US west coast) and Hector's Dolphins (found in New Zealand) on the same day is infinitely small.  Even smaller is the likelihood that they'll give you a good look at their teeth. The best plan is to be knowledgeable about the species you are likely to encounter in your area.

Thanks for the great questions, Math Teachers of Hawaii.  If you'll notice, I haven't actually given much space to the actual workshop.  I'll get to that later. See what happens when you ask a scientist about something that interests them?!

If you ask a scientist a question...
they'll want a cookie.

Who am I kidding, I always want cookies.

Tweet

We Should Have Studied Dolphins in High School Math

When I look back at my educational career, it's really striking how poor of a student I was.  That is, I was a pretty mediocre student in the "hard" sciences until I took Marine Biology class during my senior year of college.  Most of the time, I think I was just really bored.  It wasn't always because the material wasn't challenging or useful (although sometimes this was the case). It was often because I had no idea what the point of it was.  OK, so in physics we could calculate where a ball would land based on the angle and force.  I only played baseball when forced to in gym class, and when I did I had no control over the force and angle of my wild swings.  I didn't have a home catapult, and I just didn't get how this stuff could really matter to ME.

It wasn't until I got really interested in marine biology, and specifically whale and dolphin bioacoustics, that I started seeing how amazing and cool math & physics can be.  If you read my blog, you know that bioacoustics is the study of the sounds of living things.  Whales and dolphins use sound to communicate and find food underwater, so even if you can't see them, you can very often hear them.  Some whales, such as beaked whales, are actually easier to find by listening than by looking with your eyes.  In addition, sound travels further underwater than light, so people at the surface can even hear whales that are thousands of feet underwater, or even hundreds of miles away. We can use these sounds to track the location of the animal, and we can do it using high school math.  Super cool.

Why didn't we do this in my high school trigonometry class?

It's really pretty simple.  First, you need something in the water making a sound.  Let's say... a whale.

Then you'll need a boat and something to record the sound.  We're going to use a hydrophone array, which is made up of three underwater microphones (hydrophones) strung in a line, with 15 meters between each hydrophone.  

When the whale makes a sound, it travels in a straight line through the water* to each hydrophone, arriving at the closer hydrophones sooner and arriving at the further hydrophones last.  Let's say the sound arrives at our recordings at time 0 for hydrophone 1, 0.006 seconds for hydrophone 2, and 0.0007 seconds for hydrophone 3.

How on earth do we figure out the distance to a whale when all we know is the difference between when we heard it on hydrophones 1, 2, and 3?  Easy - there's a simple equation for that!

The sound speed in water is 1500 m/s (which is why I put the hydrophones 15 m apart - to make the math easier).

We've replaced some of the words with numbers, something I HATED in high school.  Oh wait, I still hate it, so I'll just explain what the equations mean: The time difference between hydrophone 1 and 2 (t21) is equal to the difference between the distance between the whale and hydrophone 1 and the distance between the whale and hydrophone 2 (d2-d1) divided by the speed of sound.  Holy mother of god, this is just geometry!  I could have been doing this when I was 15! Some of you over-achiever types probably took geometry in 8th grade, so you could have done this when you were 14. Not me!

With a little algebraic rearrangement (which I am not going to bore you with, since you can look it up here), we get:

**

Sx and Sy are the x and y locations of the whale. C the speed of sound in salt water, 1500 m/s.  dh is the distance between the hydrophones, which in this case is 15 m, and all the ts refer to the time difference between the hydrophones (the small numbers tell you which two hydrophones: t21 is the difference between the arrival at hydrophone 2 and 1, etc).  All you have to do now is plug in the numbers. Edited 5/12/2012: To make it even easier, I've provided a spreadsheet here.

**

Then you can graph the location of the whale (-16.7, ±241.7), along with the locations of your hydrophones at (0, 0), (0, 15), and (0, 30).  I've just made designated hydrophone 1 at (0, 0) to make things easy, but in real life you'd have a GPS on the boat and you'd have to add the length of the hydrophone cable to the location of the boat's gps.

You might notice something funny about this equation - it actually gives two solutions - one on either side of the line of hydrophones.  That's a big problem with using three (or four, five, etc.) hydrophones in a row - you're not really sure what side of you the whale's on.  The reason for this is that there are two possible solutions for Sy. However, you can figure out which side the whale is on by turning the boat.  The location that stays in relatively the same place regardless of where the hydrophones are is the correct one.  Other ways to fix the left-right ambiguity? Make your hydrophones into a 2D shape (hard to do when dragging them behind a boat because 2d shapes are not very streamlined)*** or use DIFAR.

I wish I had done this kind of math in high school - it is totally within the realm of a high school student!  I think I might have paid better attention to something cool like finding whales.  On the other hand, maybe not.  That boy across the room WAS pretty dreamy.  Not all kids will be interested enough in whales and dolphins to get interested in math and physics, but the cool thing about math and physics is that, regardless of what you're into, I bet it applies.  From video games to raising miniature ponies, there's math in there somewhere.  Sometimes it just takes the right spark to get people interested.

P.S. If I made any mistakes above, please call me out.  Like I said, I didn't do so well in math class.  Also, if you're interested in a copy of the xcel spreadsheet with the equations already in it, shoot me a message and I'll send you a copy.

* This isn't always the case - sometimes the sound bounces off the bottom or the surface to get to the hydrophone, but I'm ignoring those cases here for simplicity.

** Edit: May 9, 2012. I made a HUGE mistake the first time I posted this and completely ignored the equation for t1 (I thought t1 was a typo for t12).  This is now fixed.

*** Edit: May 8, 2012.  Changed "3D" to "2D" because of a comment from Sam Denes. I had thought a straight line was already 2D, but apparently a straight line is 1D and adding another point off the line makes something 2D.

Note: I got to talk to a bunch of high school math teachers about this math.  Recap here.

  Tweet